Four pillars
Crawlability, page clarity, quotability and authorship. Twenty five points each, one hundred in total. You get the score, the points per pillar, and how much the number changed since the last run.
Quotability and authorship are about AI assistants lifting a paragraph from your page and naming you. The other two are the usual crawling and structure checks.
Each fix is worth points
A recommendation tells you what it is worth: 1.1 points, 2.0 points, a fraction of one. Start with the expensive ones.
The pillar scores show where the missing points are sitting.
And how much work it is
Every fix says how many pages it affects, split between site pages and articles. 132 of 290 is a different job from 4 of 290.
Checks across everything you published
Some checks run on the whole library at once. Whether your articles share the same structure. Whether the same phrases repeat across many of them. Whether every piece ends with the same section and the headings all take one shape.
A checker that grades one page at a time cannot see any of this.
Quotability and authorship
Paragraphs that still make sense when lifted out of the page. Images and diagrams with alt text that describes something. An author with a name, a bio and experience behind it.
This is what decides whether an assistant quotes you or quotes someone else.
Fixing and rechecking
Open a fix for the detail, or copy the whole list as one prompt. Recheck the fixes when you are done, or re-run the audit for a new score. A pillar with nothing open says so.